Legal Opinion

State v. Baldonado

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1992No. 13534, 13529PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Judge.

These consolidated cases raise the question of whether there is a seizure, as a matter of law, whenever the police pull up behind a stopped car and turn on their flashing lights. We hold that there is not, but because the trial court may not have appreciated the principles governing the law of stops and seizures in its denial of defendants’ motions to suppress, we remand these cases for redetermination in light of our clarification of the applicable law.

The facts are that the officer noticed a car, with its headlights on and engine off, parked on the side of a street in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. State v. BedollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. GalvanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. State v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  4. Hrezo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API