Legal Opinion

Cimino v. Laub

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1945No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Plaintiff instituted this action of trespass to recover for personal injuries and damage to Ms automobile sustained while driving over a public road upon which defendants were doing construction work, and he received the jury’s verdict. The court below granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial because of the inadequacy of the verdict, but refused defendants’ motion for judgment n. o. v. Defendants have appealed from the court’s order refusing their motion, but have no.t assigned as error the granting of the new trial. In those circumstances, the verdict no longer exists,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Bernheim & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Perrotti v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Township of Crescent v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Simmons v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Rowland v. CanusoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Wallace v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Rodgers v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wallace v. Burke, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Seregos v. C. W. Good, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API