Viking Yacht Co. v. Composites One LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is the Motion by Defendant Cook Composites and Polymers (“CCP”) to Exclude the Opinions and Testimony of James M. Caruthers, Ph.D. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I
The facts of this case have been set-out in several previous opinions1 and need not be fully repeated here. At issue in this Motion are the expert report and testimony of James M. Caruthers, Ph.D.,2 pertaining to the laboratory testing and chemical composition of 953 Series gel.
Caruthers offers three interrelated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009