Legal Opinion
In re Grand Jury Investigation into Possible Violations of Title 18
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 20, 1978No. 78-1755PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion by an intervenor to quash a grand jury subpoena addressed to the Clerk of the House of Representatives. The proceedings commenced when on March 6, 1978, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania filed an ex parte motion for an order authorizing a subpoena duces tecum to the Honorable Edmund L. Henshaw, Clerk of the House of Representatives. The motion sought to compel the Clerk’s appearance before a grand jury in the Eastern District, together with his production of all records…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Glen Smith, Elton Rieara, Elvis Smith and Roland GeorgesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Norman TurkishCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Richard P. Herman, United States of America v. James J. McCann in No. 78-1282Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Maryann Paisley v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of Nathan MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.