Garland v. Ruskin
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have moved for a temporary injunction to enjoin the defendants “from disposing of any more land in the Cedar Street redevelopment project” and “from allowing any further construction on the Cedar Street redevelopment project.” In support of the application, plaintiffs have submitted only one affidavit, a five-page affidavit by the plaintiff Richard D. Garland.
The unverified complaint in the action prays for a decree enjoining defendants “from operating, maintaining and developing the Cedar Street redevelopment project in an arbitrary discriminatory manner,”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Helene P. Pierre v. Frank M. Jordan, Secretary of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Claudia Walker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, and Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- The Oklahoma High School Athletic Association v. BrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Nadya, Inc. v. Majestic Metal Specialties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oleg Cassini, Inc. v. Couture Coordinates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,356 International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Andean Credit, S.A., Intervenor-Appellant. International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Fairfield General Corporation, International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- 601 WEST 26 CORP. v. Solitron Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Brass v. HobermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley v. VolpeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.