Legal Opinion
Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1936No. 24694, 24695, 25023 and 25065PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Couet.
Valuation Including Peice Teends.
As of the date certain of June 30, 1925, the commission fixed the tentative valuation of the company’s property at $104,282,735. Subsequently this was reduced $10,575,247. Item by item the company complains about the commission’s figures such as those relating to right of way, land, buildings, central office equipment, distributing system, undistributed construction costs, going concern value and construction work in progress. However, a laborious study of the superabundant record of approximately 70,000 pages discloses a sharp conflict of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re New England Tel. & Tel. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. McQuaidCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Dworken v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.