Legal Opinion

Rose v. Wortham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1895PublishedCited by 30 opinions

FROM CAMPBELL. Appeal from Chancery Court of Campbell County. H. 13. Lindsay, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The question involved in this case is to whom the proceeds of a policy on the life of .Sidney Wortham, for $5,000, shall be paid; whether to his widow and child or to his creditors. The Chancellor held that the widow and child were entitled to the proceeds, after deducting certain expenses of collection, and the administrator and creditors appealed to this Court, and assigned as error this holding of the Chancellor. The cause has been heard by the Court of Chancery Appeals, and they *507hare affirmed the decree of the Chancellor, and the administrator and creditors have appealed from that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Silver v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Ragland v. Justices of the Inferior Court ex rel. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State ex rel. Timothy v. HowseTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Boro v. HidellTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Corn v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Nashville Trust Co. v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API