Legal Opinion

Matter of Crislip

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1990No. 19028PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

This is a review of a judicial disciplinary proceeding initiated against Magistrate Ronald L. Crislip. The Judicial Hearing Board (Board) found Magistrate Crislip had violated Canon 3 of the Judicial Code of Ethics, requiring a judge to perform the duties of his office impartially and diligently. The Board recommended a public reprimand. On review, the Judicial Investigation Commission (Commission) requests that we impose a more severe sanction.

Our traditional role in judicial disciplinary matters is to make an independent evaluation of the record and to consider whether the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Matter of RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. Matter of HaddadArizona Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mangum v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Matter of BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re TolerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API