Matter of Crislip
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice:
This is a review of a judicial disciplinary proceeding initiated against Magistrate Ronald L. Crislip. The Judicial Hearing Board (Board) found Magistrate Crislip had violated Canon 3 of the Judicial Code of Ethics, requiring a judge to perform the duties of his office impartially and diligently. The Board recommended a public reprimand. On review, the Judicial Investigation Commission (Commission) requests that we impose a more severe sanction.
Our traditional role in judicial disciplinary matters is to make an independent evaluation of the record and to consider whether the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re PauleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Matter of RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Matter of HaddadArizona Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Mangum v. LambertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re TolerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Matter of HeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.