Estate of O'Connor v. O'Connor
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtO'Rourke, Acting P. J.
Appellants Brian O'Connor and Astrid O'Connor Bassett appeal from orders (1) declaring that decedent John O'Connor's power of appointment exercised in his will complied with the requirements of Probate Code 1 section 632 and (2) for probate of his will. The sole question for our independent review arising out of both appeals is whether the language in the decedent's will-"I exercise any Power of Appointment which I may have over that portion of the trust or trusts established by my parents for my benefit or any other trusts for which I have Power of Appointment"-constitutes a valid and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of EimersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Estate of Stafford CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF RALPH SABEL (P-214806, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Riverside County Public Guardian v. SnukstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Tedesco v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.