Legal Opinion

Gugle v. Wachner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1943No. Nos. 19020 & 19021PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SHERICK, J.

These actions are jointly presented and considered although they are not consolidated. They are separate appeals on questions of law from orders sustaining demurrers to the second amended petitions filed in each case, upon which final judgments were entered inasmuch as plaintiff did not desire to further plead.

Without further ado we shall first epitomize the material averments of the pleadings in the Wachner case. Inasmuch as the condemned petitions are of like tenor in their general averments, we shall next note those allegations of the Loeser pleadmg which have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. R. H. McWilliams, Jr., Co. v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  5. Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. HenthorneFayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1955
  2. Rittenhouse v. HolfordFayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API