McKinney v. Chapman
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The plaintiff, Daphne McKinney, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Brian Chapman, her former supervisor. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the defendant was absolutely privileged to publish allegedly defamatory statements about her contained in two documents that he had written and prepared. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following procedural history and facts, as taken from the pleadings, affidavits, the court’s memorandum of decision and other documentary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Heussner v. Day, Berry and Howard, LLPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- DaGraca v. Kowalsky Bros., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grignano v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Martin v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- DeOliveira v. PMG Land Associates, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Lefebvre v. ZarkaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Anderson v. GORDON, MUIR AND FOLEY, LLPConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.