Legal Opinion

Groth v. Van Deursen

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 6, 1948No. Docket 158/219PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The object of this cause is to elicit a judicial construction of the will of one Isaac E. Dunn, deceased, and a declaration of the rights of those who claim under its terms beneficial interests in the testator's estate.

There are two articles of the testator's will which comprise the subject-matter to which the present inquiry is particularly addressed. I exhibit each in its literal form:

"First, after my lawful debts are paid, I give to my wife Louisa, one half of all that I shall die seized and possessed as long as she shall remain unmarried, and my widow, but on her decease or marriage, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gaston v. FordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Weaver v. PattersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  3. Annin's executors v. Vandoren's administratorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1861
  4. Trafton v. BainbridgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  5. Anderson v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BURLINGTON COUNTY NAT. BANK, MEDFORD v. BraddockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Laval v. OsterhoutNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API