Legal Opinion

Turner v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 21, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case 108 — ACTION AGAINST STAKEHOLDER TO RECOVER MONEY BET ON AN ELECTION APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The evidence shows that W. W. Thompson was the stakeholder of an election bet between H. Clay Turner and Harlan C. Turner, of the one part, and W. S. Lloyd of the other part; that before the stake was handed the alleged winner, H. Clay Turner notified the stakeholder to return to him his stake or deposit; also, that Harlan C. Turner, before the stake was handed…

Read the full summary

Case 108 — ACTION AGAINST STAKEHOLDER TO RECOVER MONEY BET ON AN ELECTION APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The evidence shows that W. W. Thompson was the stakeholder of an election bet between H. Clay Turner and Harlan C. Turner, of the one part, and W. S. Lloyd of the other part; that before the stake was handed the alleged winner, H. Clay Turner notified the stakeholder to return to him his stake or deposit; also, that Harlan C. Turner, before the stake was handed the alleged winner, notified the stakeholder to return to him his stake or deposit. The record further shows that the…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HOBSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

Shortly before the presidential election in 1896, appellants made a bet with W. S. Loyd on the result of the *649election. Appellant H. Clay Turner drew Ms check on the Traders’ Deposit Bank of Mt. Sterling for $700, payable to appellee, W. W. Thompson, who was the cashier of the bank, and O. K.’d the check, which was placed in an envelope with $700 belonging to Loyd. The envelope was then delivered to Thompson, as stakeholder, with this endorsement: “To be delivered to H. Clay Turner if Bryan carries Kentucky, and to be delivered to W. S. Loyd if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ivey v. PhiferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  2. Donahoe v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  3. Shackleford v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Scott v. CurdDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API