Legal Opinion

Scott v. Curd

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided December 5, 1951No. 876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, Chief Judge.

The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff is derived from section 372.040 of Kentucky Revised Statutes, relating to gambling transactions, which provides: “If the loser or his creditor does not, within six months after its payment or delivery to the winner, sue for the money or thing lost, and prosecute the suit to recovery with due diligence, any other person may sue the winner, and recover treble the value of the money or thing lost, if suit is brought within five years from the delivery or payment.”

The complaint, as amended, alleges that the plaintiff, Faye R. Scott,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marvin v. Maysville St. Railroad & Transfer Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Turner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boone County Water v. Public Service CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API