Legal Opinion

Martin v. Francis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 30, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Knott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Reversing.

Passing several questions of practice raised by counsel for appellant and going at once to tbe merits of the case, we find that on October 31, 1913, Martin, the appellant, together with Napier, Sturgill and Case-bolt, executed to J. D. Smith a promissory note for five *531(six) hundred dollars, payable one month after date; that this note was assigned by Smith to one Cody, and by Cody to Francis; that in 1914 Francis brought suit on this note against the payors; that the appellee, Richie, in November, 1915, came into the case by a petition to be made…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Schneider v. Local Union No. 60, United Ass'n Journeymen PlumbersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Basket v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Exchange National Bank v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Donahoe v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. Churchill DownsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Motes v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Gehres v. AterOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Fox v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API