Axtell v. Pulsifer
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed in the circuit court of Cook county on February 29, 1888, by Edward F. Pulsifer, Mary E. Pulsifer and William N. Thompson, the defendants in error, against Rosetta M. Axtell, Rosalin W. Howarth, and Charles O. Axtell, the plaintiffs in error, for the purpose of setting aside a decree rendered in a certain cause in said court wherein the plaintiffs in error…
Read the full summary
Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. This is a bill filed in the circuit court of Cook county on February 29, 1888, by Edward F. Pulsifer, Mary E. Pulsifer and William N. Thompson, the defendants in error, against Rosetta M. Axtell, Rosalin W. Howarth, and Charles O. Axtell, the plaintiffs in error, for the purpose of setting aside a decree rendered in a certain cause in said court wherein the plaintiffs in error filed original and amended bills against the defendants in error, and for permission to file answers to said original and…
1Per curiam
If the bill in this case should be regarded as a bill of review for error apparent upon the face of ■ the record, it can not be said that the pleadings of either party conform strictly to the rules applicable to such a proceeding. The bill states the substance of the bills, proceedings and decree sought to be reviewed, but does not make copies thereof exhibits to the bill. (Griggs v. Gear, 3 Gilm. 2; id. 541.) When the court is asked to determine whether error is apparent upon the face of the decree, there should be brought before it for inspection the record of the proceedings of the suit in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bruschke v. Der Nord Chicago Schuetzen VereinIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Ebert v. GerdingIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Marvin v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Enochs v. HarrelsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1879
- Judson v. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin Brothers Implement Co. v. DiepholzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- North Avenue Building & Loan Ass'n v. HuberIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Adamski v. WieczorekIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Lindblom v. DohertyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Traeger v. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.