Legal Opinion
State v. Starfield
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 2, 1991No. C5-90-2182PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Judge.
FACTS
Following a jury trial, Sandra S. Star-field, appellant, was convicted of a violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. 1(a) (1988) (physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol). Appellant’s license had been suspended prior to this incident due to an implied consent violation, and therefore, this offense was elevated from a misdemeanor to a gross misdemeanor. Minn.Stat. § .169.129 (1988).
On February 24, 1989, Ramsey County Sheriff’s Deputies were called to the scene of an accident in Gem Lake. The state alleged appellant had driven her automobile…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. RuudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State, City of Falcon Heights v. PazderskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Martin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Roberts v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. ShepardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992