Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 7, 1927No. 194PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). To permit recovery by tow from tug in this, the ordinary assertion of tower’s liability, the tow must bear the burden of affirmatively showing that the injury received was proximately caused by some act or omission of the tug, inconsistent with that reasonable care and skill impliedly promised when the towage contract concluded. That proof of negligence is often reached by inferences or presumptions from the facts proved is not opposed to the foregoing always applicable rule of law.

The one fact here proved is that, after mooring the first tow in a manner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McWilliams Bros. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. James McWilliams Towing LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Hughes v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  4. McWilliams v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. O'Boyle v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleary Bros. v. Port Reading R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Roah Hook Brick Co. v. Erie R. Co. United States v. The Roah HookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Shamrock Towing Co. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. American Sugar Refining Co. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. New Jersey Shipbuilding & DredgIng Co. v. Tracy Towing LineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API