American Sugar Refining Co. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It neither is, nor can be, claimed that the Brazil, moored as it was, without any power whatever, could have avoided the collision or was in any way at fault. Nor is there any question about O’Brien Bros., Inc., being entitled to salvage for the final picking up and successful tieing up of the scows. We will assume, for the purposes of this ease, without deciding, that the Bouker tug negligently left these scows insecurely moored at the bulkhead, and consider whether such negligence was the proximate cause of what followed. It is seen that the scow captains…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The SunnysideCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- The M. E. LuckenbachDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1912
- The PantherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- The M. E. LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- McWilliams v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Tebbs v. Baker-Whiteley Towing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Tug Christine MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Burns Bros. v. Erie R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation v. Tug Christine MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962