Legal Opinion

O'Boyle v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 1924No. 257PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). This case really .involves a question of fact, for the law is simple enough. When a tug master has brought his tow to her place of destination, and moored or landed her safely at that destination, his task is completed, and he is discharged from further responsibility. Hughes v. Railroad Co. (D. C.) 93 Fed. 510. McWilliams v. Railroad Co., 203 Fed. 859, 122 C. C. A. 84; The Jersey Central, 221 Fed. 625, 137 C. C. A. 349; The Ganoga, 257 Fed. 720, 169 C. C. A. 8.

The question in the case at bar, therefore, is whether the tow was safely moored. There was at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. McWilliams v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. The Jersey CentralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  4. The GanogaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Anna O'BoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Wessel, Duval & Co. v. Charleston Lighterage & Transfer Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1928
  3. Bouchard Transp. Co. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  4. Brigham v. Cornell Steamboat Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. Hebert v. Barge ABL-22District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API