Legal Opinion
Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Cannon
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 4, 1990No. 90 C 2941PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER'
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are the motions of defendants Maurice Cannon (“Cannon”), Cook-DuPage Transportation Company, Inc. (“Cook-DuPage”), the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Bernard Ford (“Ford”), the Director of the CTA, to dismiss plaintiff’s ease in its entirety. For the following reasons, the court grants the motions.
On a motion to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint as well as the reasonable inferences to be drawn from them are taken as true. Doe v. St Joseph’s Hospital, 788 F.2d 411 (7th Cir.1986). The plaintiff need not set out in detail the facts upon…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- JH BY DH v. West Valley CityUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Gwynn v. TransCor America, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Johnson v. CannonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Atkinson v. B.C.C. Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Burgess v. Clairol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.