Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. B.C.C. Associates, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 12, 1993No. 91 Civ. 4443 (MBM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MUKASEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that defendant, her former employer, violated her constitutional rights when it fired her in March 1990 after she tested positive for cocaine use during a random urinalysis. Plaintiff and defendant both move for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motion is denied, defendant’s motion is granted, and the case is dismissed.

I

Defendant B.C.C. Associates, Inc. (“BCC”) is a 60-employee private corporation headquartered in Brookfield, Connecticut. (Def. Rule 3(g) Statement ¶ 1; S. Conant…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re South African Apartheid LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Drake v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Szekeres v. SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  4. Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Griffin-El v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API