Legal Opinion

Roy v. Lancaster

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1991No. 21332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Young, J.:

Both parties to this appeal claim title to real property in Henderson, Nevada. Prior to trial, the district court granted partial summary judgment to respondents. The court ruled as a matter of law that respondents held fee simple title to the property in question. The court also denied appellants’ motion to join the United States as a party. The court subsequently granted sole title and interest in the property to respondents.

Proper resolution of this appeal requires that we trace the chain of title to the property in question. On May 13, 1955, the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Leven v. Wheatherstone Condominium Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pressler v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Schneider v. Continental Assurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Coblentz v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union Welfare FundNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Dakis v. SchefferNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API