Legal Opinion

Pressler v. City of Reno

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2002No. 36662PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Leavitt, J.:

Appellant David Pressler raises several claims of error relating to a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Reno and its employees (“City”). We conclude that the amendment to the City’s charter converting various appointed positions to at-will status was not intended to apply retroactively and that the district court erred in concluding that Pressler was an at-will employee at the time of his termination. Thus, summary judgment was therefore improper. In addition, in the interest of judicial economy and to provide guidance to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. National Collegiate Athletic Assn. v. TarkanianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Daisy Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Shelton v. SheltonNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kahn v. Morse & MowbrayNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Village Builders 96, L. P. v. U.S. Laboratories, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API