Legal Opinion

Porter v. Mid-State Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 1988No. 8713DC1026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. She argues that her evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the issue of defendant’s negligence. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s order.

In considering defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, the court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and give the plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference that can be drawn from the evidence. Husketh v. Conven*520ient Systems, 295 N.C. 459, 461, 245 S.E. 2d 507, 508-09 (1978). The motion can…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Kekelis v. Whitin MacHine WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Revis v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Young v. Anchor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Little v. Wilson Oil CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. CottonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Doris R. Winkler v. Charlotte Motor Speedway, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API