Legal Opinion
Raymond Razo Perez v. Jerry Allen Seevers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1989No. 88-1510PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Per curiam
Raymond Razo Perez (“Perez”) appeals pro se the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Nevada State Trooper Jerry Seev-ers, Judge William Beemer, Judge Jerry Carr Whitehead, Judge Donald Pope, and prosecutor Michael Gregg. Perez contends that the district court erred in finding that his complaint was barred by the statute of limitations.
The Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 279-80, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1948-49, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985), that the applicable state statute of limitations for section 1983 claims is the limitations period for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
3Cited by74 opinions
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Pedro Rosales-Martinez v. Colby PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Day v. ZubelNevada Supreme Court · 1996
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.