Legal Opinion

Day v. Zubel

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1996No. 26579PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*974OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

Val Davis Day filed a complaint for legal malpractice against Eric Zubel when Zubel failed to file civil rights claims on Day’s behalf. The district judge granted Zubel’s motion for summary judgment on the following grounds: (1) the statute of limitations expired on March 15, 1993, which was before Day met with Zubel; and (2) Day’s alleged cause of action contained no viable underlying claims. We conclude the district judge’s grant of summary judgment was improper.

FACTS

In September 1982, Day was convicted of and imprisoned for sexual assault. Subsequently, Day’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. LaMantia v. RedisiNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Clark v. RobisonNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Michaels v. State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  5. Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API