Legal Opinion
Pedro Rosales-Martinez v. Colby Palmer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2014No. 12-15077PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HELLERSTEIN, Senior District Judge:
This is an action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff, Pedro Rosales-Martinez, complains that he was unlawfully convicted and imprisoned as a result of violations of his constitutional rights. He alleges that the defendants, acting under color of State law, unlawfully suppressed the criminal history of a confidential informant who was the main witness against him, failed to produce the documents reflecting that criminal history, and thus caused him to be found guilty of several counts of drug trafficking and to be sentenced to a term of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Ted Bradford v. Joseph ScherschligtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Michael DreyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Marvin Roberts v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Yuzi Cui v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Damion SleughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.