Legal Opinion

Bruyninga v. Nuss

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1984No. 82-617PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff collided with a glass panel adjacent to a glass door at the defendant’s service station. The plaintiff has appealed from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant.

We affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate where the mov*802ing party establishes that there exists no genuine issue of material fact in the case and that under the facts he is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Gitschel v. Sauer, 212 Neb. 454, 323 N.W.2d 93 (1982).

Upon a motion for summary judgment the court examines the evidence, not to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crosslin v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tichenor v. LohausNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Acme Laundry Company v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Corbin v. Mann's International Meat Specialties, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Dukek v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burns v. Veterans of Foreign WarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Plock v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tiede v. Loup Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Peterson v. Gering Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Bruyninga v. NussNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API