Bruyninga v. Nuss
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff collided with a glass panel adjacent to a glass door at the defendant’s service station. The plaintiff has appealed from a grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant.
We affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate where the mov*802ing party establishes that there exists no genuine issue of material fact in the case and that under the facts he is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Gitschel v. Sauer, 212 Neb. 454, 323 N.W.2d 93 (1982).
Upon a motion for summary judgment the court examines the evidence, not to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crosslin v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Tichenor v. LohausNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Acme Laundry Company v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Corbin v. Mann's International Meat Specialties, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dukek v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burns v. Veterans of Foreign WarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Plock v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Tiede v. Loup Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Peterson v. Gering Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Bruyninga v. NussNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.