Legal Opinion

Dukek v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 21, 1956No. 36,966PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Judge.

As far as material to this decision, this is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

The action is one for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when he walked into a glass panel constituting part of an entrance to defendant’s building.

Defendant operates a wholesale hardware business in a multiple-story building in the city of St. Paul. In 1949, defendant rebuilt the entrance to its building. In doing so, it retained the services of a well-known and reputable firm of architects to design the entrance and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. C. Burton Co. v. StasnyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Rosenberg v. HartmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Acme Laundry Company v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Home Public Market v. NewrockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Jiffy Markets, Inc. v. Vernon J. VogelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Peterson v. HauleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Scott v. MERCER STEEL CO., INC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API