Legal Opinion
Arestad v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 21, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00175Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 IDALIS ARESTAD, CASE NO. C22-175RSM 9 Plaintiff, 10 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL v. 11 LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 12 COMPANY, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Idalis Arestad’s Motion to Compel. Dkt. 16 #13. Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) opposes. Dkt. #14. 17 Neither party has requested oral argument. 18 Plaintiff submitted an underinsured motorist (“UIM”) claim based on a 2018 collision. 19 Plaintiff now asserts claims against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Garcia v. City of El CentroDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2003
- Schreib v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.