Legal Opinion

Hurlburt v. Zaunbrecher

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 18, 1996No. Civil No. 96-CV-543 (RSP/RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

RALPH W. SMITH, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge.

In this civil rights action, brought pro se and informa pauperis pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), plaintiff, a federal inmate, has been experiencing great difficulty in serving process on defendant. Accordingly, he has sought the court’s assistance in effecting service of process in this case.

Plaintiffs service problems arise out of the fact that, although defendant has actual knowledge of the existence of this action, she refuses to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Anthony Romandette v. Weetabix Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Thomas M. Armstrong v. Robert Sears, Ulises Delgado, John Rice, and Frederick MaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  5. Thomas v. Yonkers Police Dept. Transportation UnitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roache v. FisherDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API