Legal Opinion

Newcomer Products v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge McCLOSKEY.

Newcomer Products and Zurich North America (hereafter collectively referred to as Employer) petition for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), granting the claim petition filed on behalf of William Irvin (Claimant). We now affirm.

Employer employed Claimant for approximately thirty-five years. 1 For the last five to seven years, Claimant was steadily employed as a furnace operator. In this position, Claimant was exposed to a constant humming noise from a pump on a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. General Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. McGarry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. University of Pennsylvania v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Capasso v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Remaley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. DPW/Norristown State Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. v. WCAB (McGonigle)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API