Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment between two insurance companies and involves an automobile liability policy. The policy was purportedly cancelled by the insured’s agent acting under a valid power of attorney obtained from the insured as part of a plan for the financing of premium payments. By statute, Pennsylvania provides that if an insurer cancels an automobile policy for the nonpayment of premiums, 15 days notice to the insured is necessary. The question here is whether that same notice is mandated when the policy is cancelled by the insured’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chamberlain v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hayes v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Liguori v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Daniels v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Garber v. American Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nationwide Insurance v. Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Tate v. Hamilton Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- PRUDENTIAL PROP. & CAS. INS. v. Safeguard Mut. Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Donegal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1990