Legal Opinion
United States v. Joey Haun
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 26, 1997No. 96-5505PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
The government filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee against Joey Haun under the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C. §§ 181-229 (the Act), to collect a civil penalty and to enjoin Haun from carrying on the business of a livestock dealer without having registered with the Secretary of Agriculture and filed the requisite bond. The district court declined to accept jurisdiction over the case, declaring that the action was “better handled administratively.” As we read the plain language of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Randleman v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Lewis Williams, Jr. v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State ex rel. Banc One Corp. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Duramax Diesel Litig. Andrei Fenner v. Gen. Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- United States v. Any and All Radio Station Transmission Equipment, Radio Frequency Power Amplifiers, Radio Frequency Test Equipment and Any Other Equipment Associated With or Used in Connection With the Transmission at 97.7 Mhz, Located at 2903 Bent Oak Highway, Adrian, Michigan, Rick Strawcutter, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.