Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Nelson
Introduction
¶3 3 As the maj ority opinion points out, resolution of the issue on appeal presents a practical dilemma of choosing between two competing public policies — one favoring settlements and the other favoring placing responsibility upon the “up stream” manufacturer of a defective product notwithstanding that the manufacturer is released from liability by the injured plaintiff. In the context of this case — a strict products liability action — I cannot agree with the Court that the former policy must take precedence over the latter. To the contrary, I conclude that the latter policy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Deere & Co. v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- Poulsen v. Treasure State Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
- Lechuga, Inc. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Sternhagen v. Dow Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.