Collins & Ryan v. Hudson
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Carey, J.:
Two questions are presented: (1) is the evidence sufficient to justify the Board’s finding that claimant’s hernia arose out of his employment; (2) is the award for surgical, medical and hospital bills justified by the evidence? Discussion of these questions requires an examination of the testimony and other parts of the record.
The claimant’s usual work was that of a salesman of gas and electrical appliances. Apparently, he was not ordinarily called upon to lift heavy objests. On January 3, 1949,- the day of the alleged accident, he was helping to take inventory. It became necessary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Le Tourneau v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Claim of Alpert v. J. C. & W. E. PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Arduini v. General Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Yurow v. Jersey Hat Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Milowicki v. Post and Paddock, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- GENERAL CHEMICAL DIVISION, ETC. v. FasanoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
- Mitchell v. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
- McCormick Transportation Co. v. BaroneSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Barone v. McCormick Transportation CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.