Legal Opinion

Arduini v. General Ice Cream Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 12, 1937PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The finding of the compensation commissioner, with such corrections as the trial court justifiably held warranted, discloses the following facts material to the present inquiry: On the morning of Saturday, August 8th, 1936, the plaintiff was working in the freezing room of the named defendant. While he and a fellow-employee were lifting a can of ice cream mix he felt a “snap” in the left side and said to his companion, “Gee, I felt a snap,” but he felt no pain, it did not hurt, and he forgot about it and continued to work the remainder of the day. Early in the evening, while at home, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merriam v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. O'Brien v. Wise Upson Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Clini v. New Haven Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gateway Construction Company v. WallbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Lucedale Veneer Co. v. RogersMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. BlackshearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API