Legal Opinion
GENERAL CHEMICAL DIVISION, ETC. v. Fasano
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 26, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 86, 1952PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Herrmann, J.:
The Industrial Accident Board awarded compensation to the appellee on the ground that he has an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment. In support of its award, the Board made the following findings of fact, inter alia:
“That as a result of frequent exposure to acid and gas fumes, and possible toxic and irritant organic dusts, Joseph Fasano does suffer from Emphysema.
“That the Emphysema arose out of and in the course of his employment with the General Chemical Division, of the Allied Chemical & Dye Corporation.”
The employer appeals on the ground…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Children's Bureau v. NissenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1942
- Le Tourneau v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Fritz v. E. I. duPont De Nemours & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1950
- Philadelphia Dairy Products Co. v. FarranSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- Collins & Ryan v. HudsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. McNemarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Digiacomo v. Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Turbitt v. Blue Hen Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Torres v. Allen Family FoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- A. H. Angerstein, Inc. v. JankowskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.