Application of Rose
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Judge.
Appellant Rose seeks review and reversal of the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of ten claims, numbered 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 16, 17, 18, 20, and 21, embraced in his application for patent on alleged improvements in a loader or conveyor such as is used in coal mines.
Specifically, says the Primary Examiner, “The invention relates to a hydraulic jack system for tensioning the conveyor chain on the discharge section of a loader used in a coal mine.”
The Primary Examiner’s description of the device,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re VickersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- In re LangdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In re McCabeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re WhartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re SpenglerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Admiral Insurance Company v. Comly Road Holdings, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025