Legal Opinion

In re Spengler

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 7, 1945No. 4957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

Claims 1, 3, 5, 7 to 10 inclusive, 16 to 19 inclusive, and 23 to 28 inclusive, of appellants’ application for a patent were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office. Certain claims hereinafter referred to were allowed. Appellants appealed to the Board of Appeals, and the examiner’s rejection of said claims was there affirmed. Appellants then appealed here from the board’s decision.

The application relates to ignition apparatus and more particularly to radio shielding means for electric apparatus such as is used in internal combustion engines, especially for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re ReplogleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. In re JonesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API