Legal Opinion

Utah Black Marble Co. v. American Marble & Onyx Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1913No. 2465PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Son. J. E. Booth, Judge. Action by the Utah Black Marble Company against the American Marble -and Onyx Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStbaup, J.

Tbe plaintiff by this action seeks to have adjudged that the defendants hold! certain placer mining claims in trust for it, and prays that the defendants be required to convey them to it. The plaintiff had judgment. From a portion of it the defendant American Marble & Onyx Company appeals.

The evidence shows:

The defendants Cornelius, Thor, and Oliver Cederstrom are brothers; the defendant Dolly Cederstrom is their sister; the defendant Ellen Cederstrom their mother; the defendant Eiseman their brother-in-law. Prior to July, 1909, the defendants, in Utah county, located marble deposits, one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walkenhorst v. KeslerUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wilcox v. ClowardUtah Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API