Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilcox v. Cloward

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1936No. 5655Published

1DissentMoffat, Justice

I am unable to agree with that part of the prevailing opinion wherein the finding and judgment of the trial court disallowing the homestead claim of Cora Cloward is affirmed. Cora Cloward pleaded her homestead right and offered evidence in support of the right. In the prevailing opinion it is said:

“In an equity case it has been the rule of this court not to disturb a finding of the lower court on contested or conflicting evidence unless the evidence clearly preponderates against the conclusion or finding.”

If by “contested” evidence the same thing is meant as conflicting evidence, I agree with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. Weber County Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Utah Black Marble Co. v. American Marble & Onyx Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API