Legal Opinion
Loveland v. Austin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1924No. 14727PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
On June 9, 1922, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed suit in the county court of Tulsa county against defendant in error, hereinafter called defendant, to recover on five promissory notes, each in the principal sum of $60, and one note in the principal sum of $28, making a total of $328. A demurrer to the petition, by the defendant, was overruled by the court. The defendant after filing an answer, in the form of a general denial, by leave of court filed an amended answer, in which he admitted the execution of the notes, sued upon, and alleged as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. BennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Nachtsheim v. BartleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gardner Petroleum Co. v. LooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Swain v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927