Legal Opinion

Gross v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 20, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMS, Chief Justice.

On a joint trial appellants, Hargis Gross- and Bertha Neace, were convicted of unlawfully having in their possession in local option territory intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and the punishment of each was fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for thirty days. On this appeal they insist the court erred in not sustaining their motions: 1. To discharge the jury and continue the case; 2„ to discharge the jury because the members-thereof refused to'answer or indicate an answer to a question propounded by appellants’ counsel on voir dire; 3.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. De Attley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Burman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Nuchols v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
  5. Shaw v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Byrd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  4. State v. CarrikerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Mele v. BeckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API