Gross v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
SIMS, Chief Justice.
On a joint trial appellants, Hargis Gross- and Bertha Neace, were convicted of unlawfully having in their possession in local option territory intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and the punishment of each was fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for thirty days. On this appeal they insist the court erred in not sustaining their motions: 1. To discharge the jury and continue the case; 2„ to discharge the jury because the members-thereof refused to'answer or indicate an answer to a question propounded by appellants’ counsel on voir dire; 3.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
- De Attley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Burman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Nuchols v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Shaw v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Byrd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- State v. CarrikerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Mele v. BeckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.