Legal Opinion
In Re Hopmayer
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 1992No. 89-1425PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
In January 1990 this court suspended respondent Hopmayer from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, pending a formal proceeding before the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) to determine the final discipline to be imposed. We did so upon receipt of a judgment of the Superior Court of Union County, New Jersey, which informed us that Hopmayer had been convicted on October 20, 1989, of “theft by failure to make required disposition of property received,” following a plea of guilty to an indictment charging that offense.1 Specifically, Hop-mayer…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of KentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re HopmayerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re PattersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re EberhartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re WileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re MandelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.