Legal Opinion
City of Winnfield, Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Louisiana Power & Light Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 2, 1984No. 82-1224PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCALIA, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s authorization of an increased rate under the Federal Power Act. We are of the view that the procedures used by the Commission were proper, and that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, as adopted by the Commission, correctly stated the law applicable to the facts. With one exception, the issues resolved do not occasion an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 13(c). We publish our conclusions regarding whether it was proper for the Commission to authorize not only a lower rate than that sought by the utility,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Federal Power Commission v. Conway Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kansas Cities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- The Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corp., Carolina Pipeline Corporation, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation, Public Service Company of North Carolina, Inc., Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Co., Columbia Gas Transmission Corp., Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Intervenors. Long Island Lighting Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, Commonwealthgas Pipeline Corporation, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. The Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., North Carolina Utilities Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Atlanta Gas Light Company, Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Carolina Pipeline Company, North Carolina Natural Gas Corp., Brooklyn Union Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
3Cited by23 opinions
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Maine v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Pub Svc Cmsn Cm KY v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- New Jersey Board of Public Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- "Complex" Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.