Legal Opinion
Kansas Cities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 13, 1983No. 81-2248PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCALIA, Circuit Judge:
Cities from the state of Kansas petition under 16 U.S.C. § 8251(b) (1982) for review of a Commission order approving increased electricity rates to be charged by their supplier, Kansas Gas and Electric Company (“KG & E”). The principal issues are what standard the various supply contracts established for Commission-prescribed rate changes, and whether the Commission could fix rates before determining that the new rates did not create a so-called price squeeze.
The basic facts are as follows: On September 6, 1977, KG & E filed proposed new electric rate schedules under §…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Public Util. Dist. No. 1 of Snohomish Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Qwest Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Southern Co. Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Mississippi Industries v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company, Louisiana Power & Light Company, City of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mississippi Public Service Commission, State of Arkansas, Union Carbide Corporation, Occidental Chemical Corporation, Arkansas & Missouri Congressional Delegations, Louisiana Public Service Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, Arkansas Power & Light Company, Middle South Energy, Inc., Middle South Services, Inc., and Cities of Conway and West Memphis, Arkansas, Intervenors. Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Occidental Chemical Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Reynolds Metals Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas and Missouri Congressional Delegations v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Arkansas v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mississippi Legal Services Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of New Orleans v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Missouri Public Service Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Representative Webb Franklin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Jefferson Parish, Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.