Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Lenape Regional High District Board of Education
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 25, 2007No. 2:06-cr-00428PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Senior District Judge.
This matter has come before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). 1 Oral argument was heard on Thursday, September 28, 2006, and the record of that date is incorporated here. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion to dismiss under Fed. R.CivP. 12(b)(1).
I
Plaintiff Thomas Cunningham has alleged that his First Amendment rights were violated by Defendants Lenape Regional High School District Board of Education and Dr. Daniel Hicks, the Superintendent of the District.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arrington v. Colortyme, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Byrd v. Aaron's, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cyr v. Addison Rutland Supervisory UnionDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Ogilvie v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Caissie v. City of Cape MayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.