Cyr v. Addison Rutland Supervisory Union
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. GARVAN MURTHA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The defendant in this civil rights action, the Addison Rutland Supervisory Union (“ARSU”), has filed a partial motion to dismiss. (Doc. 25.) The ARSU seeks to dismiss the claims of the plaintiff, Marcel Cyr, on the grounds that: (1) he possesses no First Amendment rights with respect to school property; (2) he possesses no liberty or property interest in accessing school property under the Fourteenth Amendment; and (3) the remainder of his Fourteenth Amendment claim duplicates his First Amendment claim. Id. at 1-2. Mr. Cyr…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. PerryDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Bandler v. Town of WoodstockDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019
- Barton v. Ann Arbor, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Carter v. BentleyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
- Nathaniel Borrell Dyer v. Atlanta Independent School SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.